Join our MediaCritics dicussion list    
 


 Tuesday 6th, January 2009 |  Contributions welcome. Please email to critics@infoedit.net | Add Commentary




 Front page


  x Music Reviews 


  x Film reviews 


  x Book reviews 


  x Media Critics 


  x Columns 


  x Entertainment News 


 Movie trailers


 Music videos


 Media Critics Magazine?



Media Critics Magazine was launched on March 1st 2005!

Media Critics Magazine (MCM) is an internet publication for keeping up to date on Today's music, movies and books. We will be publishing daily reviews on different genres.



We are looking for regular Reviewers/writers in all categories (Music, Books Movies). If you think Media Critics will benefit from your editorial, please contact us at work@infoedit.net.

Although we are an unpaid publication - isn't it fun just to get published!

If you have any queries or questions contact us at critics@infoedit.net
We would love to hear from you.




 Musical/Drama: The Phantom of the Opera



2004, U.S.A., Directed by: Joel Schumacher  (Send to friend)



Cole Ansier
moviebuffcole@yahoo.com





Running time: 144 minutes
Rating: 6 out of 10
Cast: Gerard Butler (The Phantom), Emmy Rossum (Christine Daae), Patrick Wilson (Raoul), Minnie Driver (Carlotta), and Miranda Richardson (Madame Giry).

Whatever else may be said about the film version of Andrew Lloyd Webber's monumentally successful stage musical The Phantom of the Opera, let it be said that Joel Schumacher has given it a stunning look, with its most striking visual image coming near the beginning, when the Opera Populaire of 1919 is magically restored to its former 1871 glory.

Unfortunately, he's rather clueless as how to direct a movie musical, and as a result, the movie is fairly lumbering, constantly threatening to sink under the weight of its own excess. As gorgeous as the film is to look at, its baroque attempts at visual lavishness sometimes induce tedium. Too many scenes just kind of lie flat, and there's precious little momentum or build with which to create dramatic tension (this is especially true of the musical numbers).

Part of the problem is that Lloyd Webber's musical style isn't really fitted to the movies. I don't think sung-through (or mostly sung-through in this case) movie musicals really work, as there's something about the inherent naturalism of film that seems be weighed down by the near-constant singing. In addition, the film's score, with music by Lloyd Webber and lyrics by Charles Hart and Richard Stilgoe, is not exactly up to the quality of say, Rodgers and Hammerstein, lacking specificity of character, situation, or dramatic momentum. Instead of songs that advance the plot or reveal important facets of character, Phantom's songs tend to fall pleasingly (if repetitively) on the ear, but don't give one any compelling reason to care about the story or its vapid, generic characters.

The story, of course, is one of the most familiar in all of modern literature. Originally a novel by Gaston Leroux, it has been seen in innumerable film adaptations going all the way back to the silent era. This Phantom generally keeps the outline of the famous story, in which a hideously scarred man who lurks in the catacombs beneath a famous Parisian opera house and obsessively loves a young soprano in the company whom he gives private singing lessons. However, she's merely a chorus girl, so the Phantom terrorizes the opera house's company until Christine is given leading roles. Complications arise when she begins to fall in love with a childhood acquaintance, Raoul. I'll refrain from giving away the rest of the salient plot points, though they are surely familiar to most readers.

While the musical is generally faithful to the source material, it adds virtually nothing interesting or unique to the proceedings. This material has been served better in previous films, most notably in the great Lon Chaney silent film version from 1925. It doesn't help that the musical score is so lacking in invention or dramatic incident, relying on endless reprises of its few memorable themes instead of truly fleshing out character or telling the story in a unique way.

Despite the underwhelming nature of the material of the musical The Phantom of the Opera, there is much to enjoy about this film adaptation if you're not looking for the subtlety of My Fair Lady or the razor-sharp character insight of Stephen Sondheim's musical. Some of the musical numbers are entertainingly film and manage to land, chief among them "Prima Donna", "Past the Point of No Return", and the title song. "Past the Point of No Return" worked especially well because of the sizzling sexual energy brought by Emmy Rossum (playing the young soprano to whom the Phantom gives voice lessons) and by Gerard Butler as the Phantom himself.

The performances are of variable quality. Rossum is luminous, bringing just the right combination of youthfulness, compassion, and naivete needed for Christine. As Raoul, the young man who vies with the Phantom for Christine's affection, Patrick Wilson does about as well as he can considering the mediocre material.

Unfortunately, he seems curiously lacking in screen presence here, but I'm chalking that up to the weakness of the writing rather than Wilson himself (Wilson gave an excellent performance in HBO's mini-series Angels in America). Minnie Driver, though, is fairly horrifying, camping it up outrageously and managing to make Carlotta into an agonizing caricature.

Then there's Butler, who fills the screen with his brooding presence and virile sexuality, but simply cannot sing well enough for the role of the Phantom. What were they thinking? His high note at the climax of "Music of the Night" is truly ear-splitting, a primordial yowl of pain that is far and away the scariest thing in the film. He can carry a tune, and when the music doesn't lie completely out of his range, he acquits himself adequately, but his vocal prowess is simply not up to the demands of this score.

All in all, though, this is a diverting, entertaining film for those not expecting to be intellectually edified. Fans of the show should be pleased, for the film is very faithful to the stage version (except for some rewriting of the operatic recitative, or sung dialogue). For those unacquainted with or less enamored of the musical, the film is still worth seeing for the lavish decor and visual sensibility with which Schumacher has invested it. Even with its turgid dramaturgy and repetitive musical score, this film is truly a feast for the eyes.




Send this article to a friend
Friend email address
Your name
Rate this article
  I give
 The number of ratings received is 1. And the author is ALMOST worth a full BEER!




music reviews, movie reviews, book reviews, horror reviews, erotic reviews, action reviews, self-help, cd reviews, album reviews, website reviews, media reviews, media critics

Quick Links: Music reviews, Film reviews, Book reviews, Media Critics, Entertainment News


 Top topics


  • THe Hobbit a Flop
  • Jackson's ex-wife to testify
  • Masterpiece Cinema [1]
  • FICTION/SELF-HELP: Going Deeper - How to Make Sense of Your Life When Your Life Makes No Sense
  • Get Lifted introduces a 'Lege
  • Joaquin Phoenix goes to alcohol rehab
  • Ashanti Opens 'Rose'
  • Ray Charles' Unchained Heart
  • RED, WHITE & CRUE TOUR
  • shaun of the dead


  •  Entertainment News


    2005-04-27 17:41:00
    THe Hobbit a Flop

    2005-04-27 17:31:12
    Jackson's ex-wife to testify

    2005-04-14 09:51:22
    Joaquin Phoenix goes to alcohol rehab

    More news  



     Random Quotation


    "I am NOT much of a reader, which is somewhat ironic since I AM a writer." -- Andy Martello /


     Infoedit MC Friends


    - Free content
    - Infoedit.info News
    - Amazon
    - Journalism magazine
    - Media Magic



    Copyright © Infoedit Media Critics 2005 // Hosting provided by Crucial Paradigm - www.crucialparadigm.com
    Contact us at critics@infoedit.net
    Musical_Drama__The_Phantom_of_the_Opera
    Musical_Drama__The_Phantom_of_the_Opera